Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to The Guillotine Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit.

If you join our community, you'll be able to use many member-only features such as posting messages, customizing your profile, sending personal messages, voting in polls, and fewer ads.

Email forum@theguillotine.com to find out how to get an account.

If you're already a member please log in:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Section 3AA; How we looking?
Topic Started: Oct 3 2016, 09:18 PM (140,350 Views)
thunderchicken
Member Avatar
Super Fan
[ *  *  *  * ]
westernwrestlingfan
Mar 7 2017, 08:51 AM
I think there should be an additional consequence for opting up, like make it a minimum of 4 or 6 years. There are plenty of teams that are opting up for reasons other than to avoid competition and have for many consecutive years. The ones that go up or down every other year really screw it up for those that get pushed in or out of the section every time sections are realigned. It is tough on teams that are in different sections every other year to schedule section opponents. A little consistency would be nice.
Also makes scheduling difficult for teams trying to face section opponents
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ironman32
No Avatar
Member
[ *  * ]
westernwrestlingfan
Mar 7 2017, 08:51 AM
I think there should be an additional consequence for opting up, like make it a minimum of 4 or 6 years. There are plenty of teams that are opting up for reasons other than to avoid competition and have for many consecutive years. The ones that go up or down every other year really screw it up for those that get pushed in or out of the section every time sections are realigned. It is tough on teams that are in different sections every other year to schedule section opponents. A little consistency would be nice.
I am not sure I would call it a consequence but I agree with it being a several year commitment, not allowing a team to change each time the re-alignment happens. Many times the scheduling for the next season is near complete by the time the season ends and they are already looking to schedule 2018-2019. By the time the teams on the edge schedule there new section they may be on their way out again.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Inside Trip
Member Avatar
Super Fan
[ *  *  *  * ]
Adonis Blood
Mar 7 2017, 08:16 AM
Why work harder and compete against the teams you should be assigned with? As long as the MSHL allows teams to opt up there will be teams that jump to a different class. Some call it playing the system, some call it ducking competition, some claim they do it because it is best for their team. I think it teaches a horrible lesson, but obviously not everyone agrees with that. Hey you don't get to 800 wins without knowing how to work things.
It has been noted that you are from pipestone. Remember, Pipestone used to opt up to AA as well. I personally don't care where teams wrestle. I do personally care if you are implying that Gary got to where he did by ducking competition or looking for the easy way out.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
badger1
No Avatar
Wrestling Fan
[ *  *  * ]
Maybe this has already been said but when does a decision like switching have to officially be made?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
scott83
No Avatar
Super Fan
[ *  *  *  * ]
I am surprised MSHSL allows teams to opt up or down every other year. Has to be a scheduling nightmare for Section alignments every other year after they find out who decides to opt up and down all the time in order to make sure there are somewhat equal amount of teams in each section. Also has to be difficult for AD's to schedule the following year events. If they put a stop to it sure would make things easier for all.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ironman32
No Avatar
Member
[ *  * ]
The decision had to be made to opt up by 8:00 am March 6th. Teams can only opt-up or stay in there assigned class. They CANNOT opt-down.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TFBDad
No Avatar
Super Fan
[ *  *  *  * ]
Inside Trip
Mar 7 2017, 10:02 AM
Adonis Blood
Mar 7 2017, 08:16 AM
Why work harder and compete against the teams you should be assigned with? As long as the MSHL allows teams to opt up there will be teams that jump to a different class. Some call it playing the system, some call it ducking competition, some claim they do it because it is best for their team. I think it teaches a horrible lesson, but obviously not everyone agrees with that. Hey you don't get to 800 wins without knowing how to work things.
It has been noted that you are from pipestone. Remember, Pipestone used to opt up to AA as well. I personally don't care where teams wrestle. I do personally care if you are implying that Gary got to where he did by ducking competition or looking for the easy way out.
Mshsl allows it. Not everybody likes it and just like free and reduced sometimes lots of people question it
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Land shark
No Avatar
Super Fan
[ *  *  *  * ]
Inside Trip
Mar 7 2017, 10:02 AM
Adonis Blood
Mar 7 2017, 08:16 AM
Why work harder and compete against the teams you should be assigned with? As long as the MSHL allows teams to opt up there will be teams that jump to a different class. Some call it playing the system, some call it ducking competition, some claim they do it because it is best for their team. I think it teaches a horrible lesson, but obviously not everyone agrees with that. Hey you don't get to 800 wins without knowing how to work things.
It has been noted that you are from pipestone. Remember, Pipestone used to opt up to AA as well. I personally don't care where teams wrestle. I do personally care if you are implying that Gary got to where he did by ducking competition or looking for the easy way out.
Don't think you should be calling out one of the greatest high school coaches in mn. He's a very respected coach
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Adonis Blood
No Avatar
Fanatic
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Inside Trip
Mar 7 2017, 10:02 AM
Adonis Blood
Mar 7 2017, 08:16 AM
Why work harder and compete against the teams you should be assigned with? As long as the MSHL allows teams to opt up there will be teams that jump to a different class. Some call it playing the system, some call it ducking competition, some claim they do it because it is best for their team. I think it teaches a horrible lesson, but obviously not everyone agrees with that. Hey you don't get to 800 wins without knowing how to work things.
It has been noted that you are from pipestone. Remember, Pipestone used to opt up to AA as well. I personally don't care where teams wrestle. I do personally care if you are implying that Gary got to where he did by ducking competition or looking for the easy way out.
I'm from Pipestone. If Pipestone moved every 2 years based on which section they thought they could win I'd call them on it too.

Wabasso/RRC always has a tough team, why diminish your accomplishments? Why not pick a section and stick with it? Why dodge competition? What lesson are you teaching?

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Stumplifter
Member Avatar
Threadkiller
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
ironman32
Mar 7 2017, 10:22 AM
Teams can only opt-up or stay in there assigned class. They CANNOT opt-down.
This :huh:

One cannot "opt down".
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
winner09
No Avatar
Super Fan
[ *  *  *  * ]
Adonis Blood
Mar 7 2017, 01:10 PM
Inside Trip
Mar 7 2017, 10:02 AM
Adonis Blood
Mar 7 2017, 08:16 AM
Why work harder and compete against the teams you should be assigned with? As long as the MSHL allows teams to opt up there will be teams that jump to a different class. Some call it playing the system, some call it ducking competition, some claim they do it because it is best for their team. I think it teaches a horrible lesson, but obviously not everyone agrees with that. Hey you don't get to 800 wins without knowing how to work things.
It has been noted that you are from pipestone. Remember, Pipestone used to opt up to AA as well. I personally don't care where teams wrestle. I do personally care if you are implying that Gary got to where he did by ducking competition or looking for the easy way out.
I'm from Pipestone. If Pipestone moved every 2 years based on which section they thought they could win I'd call them on it too.

Wabasso/RRC always has a tough team, why diminish your accomplishments? Why not pick a section and stick with it? Why dodge competition? What lesson are you teaching?

This is not a good post for someone from Pipestone to make without looking at all the facts. It's funny because Pipestone was in AA from at least 2000-2008. Windom was also in AA when they made their run. JCC was in AA too.

To say someone is running or going to an easier section is funny. You can make that assumption for Pipestone since the only time they made it to state was in A. Windom also went down to A after their huge runs in the mid 2000s. I don't get why you have to bash a team for making this decision.

What if Pipestone goes back up to AA. Will you eat your words? Instead of posting something to bash another team for their decision, why not embrace the grind and challenge that your team will have to make.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Adonis Blood
No Avatar
Fanatic
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
winner09
Mar 7 2017, 08:24 PM
Adonis Blood
Mar 7 2017, 01:10 PM
Inside Trip
Mar 7 2017, 10:02 AM
Adonis Blood
Mar 7 2017, 08:16 AM
Why work harder and compete against the teams you should be assigned with? As long as the MSHL allows teams to opt up there will be teams that jump to a different class. Some call it playing the system, some call it ducking competition, some claim they do it because it is best for their team. I think it teaches a horrible lesson, but obviously not everyone agrees with that. Hey you don't get to 800 wins without knowing how to work things.
It has been noted that you are from pipestone. Remember, Pipestone used to opt up to AA as well. I personally don't care where teams wrestle. I do personally care if you are implying that Gary got to where he did by ducking competition or looking for the easy way out.
I'm from Pipestone. If Pipestone moved every 2 years based on which section they thought they could win I'd call them on it too.

Wabasso/RRC always has a tough team, why diminish your accomplishments? Why not pick a section and stick with it? Why dodge competition? What lesson are you teaching?

This is not a good post for someone from Pipestone to make without looking at all the facts. It's funny because Pipestone was in AA from at least 2000-2008. Windom was also in AA when they made their run. JCC was in AA too.

To say someone is running or going to an easier section is funny. You can make that assumption for Pipestone since the only time they made it to state was in A. Windom also went down to A after their huge runs in the mid 2000s. I don't get why you have to bash a team for making this decision.

What if Pipestone goes back up to AA. Will you eat your words? Instead of posting something to bash another team for their decision, why not embrace the grind and challenge that your team will have to make.

Thanks! You made most of my points for me. You stated Pipestone was in AA for 8 years, which is exactly what Wabasso/RRC doesn't do in picking a Class and sticking with it.

I think all of us can look at the teams in a Section, see which of their wrestlers are graduating, and determine if that team will be up or down next year. From there you can guess as to which Section will offer you the greatest opportunity to be Section champ. To say different is wrong.

If Pipestone suddenly decides to follow the Wabasso/RRC model of jumping Class every 2 years I will call them out on it too, I already stated as much.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TFBDad
No Avatar
Super Fan
[ *  *  *  * ]
I will admit, gives a bad impression!!!
Edited by TFBDad, Mar 8 2017, 08:12 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
badger1
No Avatar
Wrestling Fan
[ *  *  * ]
This whole discussion makes me laugh as I coach in another state and movement of classes isn't determined by the schools itself. Each school has to turn in a projection as to its numbers over the next two years and then turn in the data to support that. The high school league then determines based on student numbers which class to put them in. It rarely changes over the years but does and isn't an immediate switch. The school is given a year, sometimes two to know they are switching unless it can show that its numbers will drop again in the near future. There have been some scenarios that schools have opted to apply to go up in class but schools can't just pick and choose over two year increments to where they want to be. That doesn't make any sense to me at all and I would hate to be an athletic director with all of this happening. Scheduling is a nightmare to begin with, I can't imagine what its like in this section.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ZZWORTH
No Avatar
Wrestling Fan
[ *  *  * ]
Just recovering from the state tourney sorry guys. Give a tip of the hat to my worthington boys tho. They tried their hardest. And will be a team with a force to be reckoned with next year. But how scary/good is fairmont/mcw team for next year. Is still gonna be a tall task, with all 3 state finalists back next year. I think fairmont is the early favorite for next year
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
BL Hornet
Member Avatar
Fantastic
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
ZZWORTH
Mar 8 2017, 05:43 PM
Just recovering from the state tourney sorry guys. Give a tip of the hat to my worthington boys tho. They tried their hardest. And will be a team with a force to be reckoned with next year. But how scary/good is fairmont/mcw team for next year. Is still gonna be a tall task, with all 3 state finalists back next year. I think fairmont is the early favorite for next year
Fairmont needs to shift everyone up a couple weights and fill the bottom in with young talent. They will be very good next year. Besides all the returning state wrestlers, they had several that were very close to making it and will be hungry.

On another note, 3AA team did not do well at all at state. If it wasn't for Prunty how many matches in team were won? 1 or 2 out of 28?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DWB79
No Avatar
Fantastic
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
BL Hornet
Mar 8 2017, 06:42 PM
ZZWORTH
Mar 8 2017, 05:43 PM
Just recovering from the state tourney sorry guys. Give a tip of the hat to my worthington boys tho. They tried their hardest. And will be a team with a force to be reckoned with next year. But how scary/good is fairmont/mcw team for next year. Is still gonna be a tall task, with all 3 state finalists back next year. I think fairmont is the early favorite for next year
Fairmont needs to shift everyone up a couple weights and fill the bottom in with young talent. They will be very good next year. Besides all the returning state wrestlers, they had several that were very close to making it and will be hungry.

On another note, 3AA team did not do well at all at state. If it wasn't for Prunty how many matches in team were won? 1 or 2 out of 28?
Yep. Worthington won 3 of 28 matches in the two duals.

Prunty won 2--and they moved him off the more challenging kid (Horsman) from K-M to wrestle another kid that had around 20 wins. He won 4-2. Coincidentally, he beat Horsman later on in individuals, but I thought it was silly to bump him up in the dual as he should be facing the toughest kid possible. There was no need to move in the dual. They had literally no chance to beat K-M.

Overall, I was a bit frustrated/disappointed in the section, only saw 7 state place winners and 3 of them were from Fairmont. Was hoping to see more. And then there was the debacle that was Worthington in the duals.

Hopefully next year is better...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
badger1
No Avatar
Wrestling Fan
[ *  *  * ]
First off I don't dislike or like Worthington, I do think they are coached well however. This section isn't deep, not one team this year didn't have some holes that coaches didn't have to try to maneuver around each dual. Yes Worthington struggled at State but who didn't againt K-M and ok Perham I had hoped our section would have shown better but lets not forget they won our section so who would have done better? Which leads me to the individual side and how are section gets zero respect in seedings. Might be because the lack of quality depth at every weight class shows up the most when our kids face battle tested kids, most of which probably are at pinnacle year round facing tough kids every day. Our good wrestlers may have three other kids in the section who can push them but those match ups don't happen very often with coaches moving kids around either trying to win the dual or save their kids seed at sections.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
VDubU
No Avatar
Fanatic
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
ironman32
Mar 7 2017, 09:03 AM
westernwrestlingfan
Mar 7 2017, 08:51 AM
I think there should be an additional consequence for opting up, like make it a minimum of 4 or 6 years. There are plenty of teams that are opting up for reasons other than to avoid competition and have for many consecutive years. The ones that go up or down every other year really screw it up for those that get pushed in or out of the section every time sections are realigned. It is tough on teams that are in different sections every other year to schedule section opponents. A little consistency would be nice.
I am not sure I would call it a consequence but I agree with it being a several year commitment, not allowing a team to change each time the re-alignment happens. Many times the scheduling for the next season is near complete by the time the season ends and they are already looking to schedule 2018-2019. By the time the teams on the edge schedule there new section they may be on their way out again.
Don't have a horse in this race but how does opting up affect the schedule? Teams schedule across all classes during the regular season so that wouldn't change. If they are in a conference the conference deals with that and what class you are in doesn't matter. Only change would be section time and those schedules aren't set until seeding. The potential for significant section changes though is present. For instance in Section 8AAA 6 of the 8 teams in it are opt ups.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ironman32
No Avatar
Member
[ *  * ]
VDubU
Mar 9 2017, 10:30 AM
ironman32
Mar 7 2017, 09:03 AM
westernwrestlingfan
Mar 7 2017, 08:51 AM
I think there should be an additional consequence for opting up, like make it a minimum of 4 or 6 years. There are plenty of teams that are opting up for reasons other than to avoid competition and have for many consecutive years. The ones that go up or down every other year really screw it up for those that get pushed in or out of the section every time sections are realigned. It is tough on teams that are in different sections every other year to schedule section opponents. A little consistency would be nice.
I am not sure I would call it a consequence but I agree with it being a several year commitment, not allowing a team to change each time the re-alignment happens. Many times the scheduling for the next season is near complete by the time the season ends and they are already looking to schedule 2018-2019. By the time the teams on the edge schedule there new section they may be on their way out again.
Don't have a horse in this race but how does opting up affect the schedule? Teams schedule across all classes during the regular season so that wouldn't change. If they are in a conference the conference deals with that and what class you are in doesn't matter. Only change would be section time and those schedules aren't set until seeding. The potential for significant section changes though is present. For instance in Section 8AAA 6 of the 8 teams in it are opt ups.
The scheduling is mainly an issue for the fringe teams, yes if you are located in the middle of region 3 like a Wabasso, you schedule all of those teams in region 3, A and AA. The problem is for teams like Fairmont, where they are equal distances from 3 different regions, and by teams opting up they could push Fairmont to section 1 or 2 which they don't have on their schedules because they have finally adjusted it for section 3 teams. If Fairmont wasn't in Section 3AA they wouldn't see any of the teams in it that isn't in their conference. I think everyone wants to wrestle everyone in their Section and it may be two years to make that happen for the "fringe" teams on opposite sides of the section. Then they get moved again cause of re-alignment.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ZZWORTH
No Avatar
Wrestling Fan
[ *  *  * ]
EARLY 2017-18 PREDICTIONS WITH CURRENT TEAMS
1. FAIRMONT/MCW
2.WORTHINGTON
3. WABASSO
4. MARSHALL
5. TMB/WWG
6. NEW ULM
7. QUAD
8. REDWOOD VALLEY
9. DB/LQPV
10. LUVERNE
11. FULDA/

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
bunnymama
Member Avatar
Wrestling Fan
[ *  *  * ]
ZZWORTH
Mar 9 2017, 11:52 AM
EARLY 2017-18 PREDICTIONS WITH CURRENT TEAMS
1. FAIRMONT/MCW
2.WORTHINGTON
3. WABASSO
4. MARSHALL
5. TMB/WWG
6. NEW ULM
7. QUAD
8. REDWOOD VALLEY
9. DB/LQPV
10. LUVERNE
11. FULDA/

Way too early for that.
The next season on the radar for this bunny is track!!!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ZZWORTH
No Avatar
Wrestling Fan
[ *  *  * ]
Yes, it does seem a bit early to speculate for next year. good luck to all in track, baseball, golf, and tennis
go Worthington go
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ironman32
No Avatar
Member
[ *  * ]
1. MCW
2. WWG
3. Marshall
4. Worthington
5. River Valley
6. New Ulm
7. RRC
8. Monte
9. RCW
10. Luverne
11. MCC

Fairmont and Tracy don't lose anyone significant from there line-up if they can stretch up again like they did this year they will be tough, edge to Fairmont with the depth down low. Marshall and Worthington both lose three starters but I think Worthington is hurt worse. River Valley and New Ulm doesn't lose much but have some holes. Wabasso loses 6 starters, not sure if they can fill the holes or not, Hindt and Bart always have a competitive team though. United loses monsters up top not sure if they can fill it out or not. Quad and Luverne lost some good seniors and Fulda is what it is i hope they can start to gain numbers and have a competitive roster again.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ironman32
No Avatar
Member
[ *  * ]
Returning section medalist by weight

106
1st Place - Jaxson Rohman of Fairmont-Martin County West, 8th
2nd Place - Hunter Baker of Luverne, 8th
3rd Place - Erik Artiga of Worthington, 10th
4th Place - Mason Irlbeck of Wabasso-Red Rock Central, 8th
5th Place - Ayden Horner of Tracy-Milroy-Balaton-Westbrook-Walnut Grove, 7th
6th Place - Jackson Bode of New Ulm, 9th

113
1st Place - Hsa La Eh of Marshall, 9th
2nd Place - Danny Blankenship of Fulda-Murray County Central, 10th
3rd Place - Cale Steuber of Fairmont-Martin County West, 9th
4th Place - Maverick Goblirsch of Redwood-River Valley, 7th
5th Place - Jaiden Jimenez of Quad County, 9th
6th Place - Carter Brandes of New Ulm, 9th

120
1st Place - Jacob Prunty of Worthington, 11th
2nd Place - Dereck Ellingson of Tracy-Milroy-Balaton-Westbrook-Walnut Grove, 10th
3rd Place - Jordan Wolter of Fairmont-Martin County West, 10th
4th Place - Trevon Johnson of Dawson-Boyd-Lac Qui Parle-Montevideo, 8th
5th Place - Cole Ranweiler of New Ulm, 8th
6th Place - Noah Jensen of Marshall, 9th

126
1st Place - Zac Ringnell of Fairmont-Martin County West, 10th
3rd Place - Tucker Oeltjenbruns of Luverne, 11th
5th Place - Lay K Paw of Worthington, 10th
6th Place - Lucas Hodges of Marshall, 10th

132
1st Place - Sean Howk of New Ulm, 10th
2nd Place - Payton Anderson of Fairmont-Martin County West, 9th
4th Place - Tayte Harazin of Redwood-River Valley, 10th

138
1st Place - Hunter Ranweiler of New Ulm, 11th
3rd Place - Anthony Axford of Tracy-Milroy-Balaton-Westbrook-Walnut Grove, 10th
4th Place - Ethan Pavelko of Worthington, 11th
5th Place - Zach Stahl of Marshall, 10th
6th Place - Nathan Simmonds of Fairmont-Martin County West, 9th

145
2nd Place - Jared Schroepfer of Wabasso-Red Rock Central, 10th
3rd Place - Mario Maldonado of Fairmont-Martin County West, 10th
4th Place - Eric Bommersbach of Redwood-River Valley, 11th
6th Place - Brayden Donkersloot of Worthington, 10th

152
1st Place - Peyton Mortenson of Dawson-Boyd-Lac Qui Parle-Montevideo, 11th
2nd Place - Tanner Stark of New Ulm, 11th
5th Place - Miles Fitzgerald of Fairmont-Martin County West, 9th
6th Place - Trevor Eisfeld of Tracy-Milroy-Balaton-Westbrook-Walnut Grove, 9th

160
1st Place - Collin Steuber of Fairmont-Martin County West, 11th
3rd Place - Nash Mayer of Tracy-Milroy-Balaton-Westbrook-Walnut Grove, 11th
5th Place - Jackson Hughes of Marshall, 10th
6th Place - Jacob Neuberger of Worthington, 10th

170
2nd Place - Nick Altermatt of Wabasso-Red Rock Central, 11th
3rd Place - Mason Byrne of Worthington, 11th
4th Place - Jace Paplow of Tracy-Milroy-Balaton-Westbrook-Walnut Grove, 9th
6th Place - Tristan Lange of Fairmont-Martin County West, 10th

182
3rd Place - Austin Schmitt of Dawson-Boyd-Lac Qui Parle-Montevideo, 11th
4th Place - Zack Felcyn of Marshall, 10th
5th Place - Tyler Timm of Tracy-Milroy-Balaton-Westbrook-Walnut Grove, 9th
6th Place - Conner Tordsen of Fairmont-Martin County West, 11th

195
3rd Place - Wyatt Martin of Marshall, 11th
5th Place - Quintin Lehmann of Dawson-Boyd-Lac Qui Parle-Montevideo, 10th
6th Place - Austin Buchholz of Tracy-Milroy-Balaton-Westbrook-Walnut Grove, 11th

220
2nd Place - Zach Luke of Luverne, 10th
3rd Place - Jaiden Bahr of Marshall, 9th
4th Place - Marcos Herrera of Worthington, 11th
5th Place - Chad Maddock of Redwood-River Valley, 9th
6th Place - Colby Wenniger of New Ulm, 9th

285
5th Place - Sam Bauer of Tracy-Milroy-Balaton-Westbrook-Walnut Grove, 10th
6th Place - Brendan Otto of Marshall, 11th
Edited by ironman32, Mar 14 2017, 11:55 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ironman32
No Avatar
Member
[ *  * ]
By team

Fairmont/MCW - 11
106 1st Place - Jaxson Rohman, 8th
113 3rd Place - Cale Steuber, 9th
120 3rd Place - Jordan Wolter, 10th
126 1st Place - Zac Ringnell, 10th
132 2nd Place - Payton Anderson, 9th
138 6th Place - Nathan Simmonds, 9th
145 3rd Place - Mario Maldonado, 10th
152 5th Place - Miles Fitzgerald, 9th
160 1st Place - Collin Steuber, 11th
170 6th Place - Tristan Lange, 10th
182 6th Place - Conner Tordsen, 11th

Fulda/MCC - 1
113 2nd Place - Danny Blankenship, 10th

Luverne - 3
106 2nd Place - Hunter Baker, 8th
126 3rd Place - Tucker Oeltjenbruns, 11th
220 2nd Place - Zach Luke, 10th

Marshall - 9
113 1st Place - Hsa La Eh, 9th
120 6th Place - Noah Jensen, 9th
126 6th Place - Lucas Hodges, 10th
138 5th Place - Zach Stahl, 10th
160 5th Place - Jackson Hughes, 10th
182 4th Place - Zack Felcyn, 10th
195 3rd Place - Wyatt Martin, 11th
220 3rd Place - Jaiden Bahr, 9th
285 6th Place - Brendan Otto, 11th

New Ulm - 7
106 6th Place - Jackson Bode, 9th
113 6th Place - Carter Brandes, 9th
120 5th Place - Cole Ranweiler, 8th
132 1st Place - Sean Howk, 10th
138 1st Place - Hunter Ranweiler, 11th
152 2nd Place - Tanner Stark, 11th
220 6th Place - Colby Wenniger, 9th

Quad - 1
113 5th Place - Jaiden Jimenez, 9th

Redwood River Valley - 4
113 4th Place - Maverick Goblirsch, 7th
132 4th Place - Tayte Harazin, 10th
145 4th Place - Eric Bommersbach, 11th
220 5th Place - Chad Maddock, 9th

TMB/WWG - 9
106 5th Place - Ayden Horner, 7th
120 2nd Place - Dereck Ellingson, 10th
138 3rd Place - Anthony Axford, 10th
152 6th Place - Trevor Eisfeld, 9th
160 3rd Place - Nash Mayer, 11th
170 4th Place - Jace Paplow, 9th
182 5th Place - Tyler Timm, 9th
195 6th Place - Austin Buchholz, 11th
285 5th Place - Sam Bauer, 10th

United - 4
120 4th Place - Trevon Johnson, 8th
152 1st Place - Peyton Mortenson, 11th
182 3rd Place - Austin Schmitt, 11th
195 5th Place - Quintin Lehmann, 10th

Wabasso/RRC - 3
106 4th Place - Mason Irlbeck, 8th
145 2nd Place - Jared Schroepfer, 10th
170 2nd Place - Nick Altermatt, 11th

Worthington - 8
106 3rd Place - Erik Artiga, 10th
120 1st Place - Jacob Prunty, 11th
126 5th Place - Lay K Paw, 10th
138 4th Place - Ethan Pavelko, 11th
145 6th Place - Brayden Donkersloot, 10th
160 6th Place - Jacob Neuberger, 10th
170 3rd Place - Mason Byrne, 11th
220 4th Place - Marcos Herrera, 11th
Edited by ironman32, Mar 14 2017, 11:55 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Gator-Roll
No Avatar
Super Fan
[ *  *  *  * ]
ironman32
Mar 10 2017, 12:43 PM
By team

Fairmont/MCW - 11
106 1st Place - Jaxson Rohman, 8th
113 3rd Place - Cale Steuber, 9th
120 3rd Place - Jordan Wolter, 10th
126 1st Place - Zac Ringnell, 10th
132 2nd Place - Payton Anderson, 10th
138 6th Place - Nathan Simmonds, 9th
145 3rd Place - Mario Maldonado, 10th
152 5th Place - Miles Fitzgerald, 9th
160 1st Place - Collin Steuber, 11th
170 6th Place - Tristan Lange, 10th
182 6th Place - Conner Tordsen, 11th

Fulda/MCC - 1
113 2nd Place - Danny Blankenship, 10th

Luverne - 3
106 2nd Place - Hunter Baker, 8th
126 3rd Place - Tucker Oeltjenbruns, 11th
220 2nd Place - Zach Luke, 10th

Marshall - 9
113 1st Place - Hsa La Eh, 9th
120 6th Place - Noah Jensen, 9th
126 6th Place - Lucas Hodges, 10th
138 5th Place - Zach Stahl, 10th
160 5th Place - Jackson Hughes, 10th
182 4th Place - Zack Felcyn, 10th
195 3rd Place - Wyatt Martin, 11th
220 3rd Place - Jaiden Bahr, 9th
285 6th Place - Brendan Otto, 11th

New Ulm - 7
106 6th Place - Jackson Bode, 9th
113 6th Place - Carter Brandes, 9th
120 5th Place - Cole Ranweiler, 8th
132 1st Place - Sean Howk, 10th
138 1st Place - Hunter Ranweiler, 11th
152 2nd Place - Tanner Stark, 11th
220 6th Place - Colby Wenniger, 9th

Quad - 1
113 5th Place - Jaiden Jimenez, 9th

Redwood River Valley - 4
113 4th Place - Maverick Goblirsch, 7th
132 4th Place - Tayte Harazin, 10th
145 4th Place - Eric Bommersbach, 11th
220 5th Place - Chad Maddock, 9th

TMB/WWG - 9
106 5th Place - Ayden Horner, 7th
120 2nd Place - Dereck Ellingson, 10th
138 3rd Place - Anthony Axford, 10th
152 6th Place - Trevor Eisfeld, 9th
160 3rd Place - Nash Mayer, 10th
170 4th Place - Jace Paplow, 9th
182 5th Place - Tyler Timm, 9th
195 6th Place - Austin Buchholz, 11th
285 5th Place - Sam Bauer, 10th

United - 4
120 4th Place - Trevon Johnson, 8th
152 1st Place - Peyton Mortenson, 11th
182 3rd Place - Austin Schmitt, 11th
195 5th Place - Quintin Lehmann, 10th

Wabasso/RRC - 3
106 4th Place - Mason Irlbeck, 8th
145 2nd Place - Jared Schroepfer, 10th
170 2nd Place - Nick Altermatt, 11th

Worthington - 8
106 3rd Place - Erik Artiga, 10th
120 1st Place - Jacob Prunty, 11th
126 5th Place - Lay K Paw, 10th
138 4th Place - Ethan Pavelko, 11th
145 6th Place - Brayden Donkersloot, 10th
160 6th Place - Jacob Neuberger, 10th
170 3rd Place - Mason Byrne, 11th
220 4th Place - Marcos Herrera, 11th
I believe Payton anderson is a freshmen not a sophmore
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kodiak_vs
No Avatar
Super Fan
[ *  *  *  * ]
Weakest section in the state. Need to restructure this one.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
grappler6
Member Avatar
Fantastic
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
kodiak_vs
Mar 12 2017, 02:56 AM
Weakest section in the state. Need to restructure this one.
Sections are based off of geographic location, not off of your desire for competitiveness.

We apologize that our geographic representation of southwest MN doesn't impress you.

This section already covers the second (8AA being the largest) largest area.

In its current landscape, how do you suggest this section be restructured?


Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DWB79
No Avatar
Fantastic
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
grappler6
Mar 12 2017, 08:36 AM
kodiak_vs
Mar 12 2017, 02:56 AM
Weakest section in the state. Need to restructure this one.
Sections are based off of geographic location, not off of your desire for competitiveness.

We apologize that our geographic representation of southwest MN doesn't impress you.

This section already covers the second (8AA being the largest) largest area.

In its current landscape, how do you suggest this section be restructured?


I personally would like to see it go back to 2 classes and probably get closer to a 16 team section...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · High School · Next Topic »
Add Reply