2AA Team & Individuals

Welcome to The Guillotine Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit.

If you join our community, you'll be able to use many member-only features such as posting messages, customizing your profile, sending personal messages, voting in polls, and fewer ads.

Email forum@theguillotine.com to find out how to get an account.

If you're already a member please log in:

Pages:
1
…
14
15
16
…
177

2AA Team & Individuals; Top contenders
Tweet Topic Started: Jun 23 2008, 11:03 AM (737,830 Views)
TheKradleKing	Dec 31 2008, 10:06 AM Post #421
Wrestling Fan Posts: 47 Group: Die Hard Member #13,787 Joined: November 20, 2008	Iowa guy Dec 31 2008, 09:51 AM greenmachine Dec 31 2008, 07:01 AM Lets hope the kids are a little more humble I hope not! I don't know any wrestler that is "humble". I think you are looking for a different word. Look it up... Green Machine - you are probably trying to tell Iowa Guy to stop "DOTING" - which means - excessively fond - like being excessively fond of the two wins his boys got over the two NP kids



greenmachine	Dec 31 2008, 10:14 AM Post #422
Super Fan Posts: 206 Group: Die Hard Member #707 Joined: January 5, 2005	Iowa guy Dec 31 2008, 09:51 AM greenmachine Dec 31 2008, 07:01 AM Lets hope the kids are a little more humble I hope not! I don't know any wrestler that is "humble". I think you are looking for a different word. Look it up... Right words. many ways to interpret the meaning. None of mine were meant to be harmful in any way. Mine was version of humble is to be not arrogant and to be respectful. HUMBLE: 1. not proud or arrogant; modest: to be humble although successful. 4. courteously respectful: In my humble opinion you are wrong.



13887	Dec 31 2008, 11:00 AM Post #423
Fanatic Posts: 542 Group: Die Hard Member #1,519 Joined: January 27, 2005	LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



crusader wrestling	Jan 2 2009, 10:14 PM Post #424
Fanatic Posts: 750 Group: Die Hard Member #8,788 Joined: June 13, 2007	Team scores from Rumble, after day 1: 1. Foley 127.0 2. Kerkhoven-Murdock-Sunburg 122.5 3. Delano 111.0 4. Owatonna 109.5 5. Scott West 102.0



sacromattackrom	Jan 3 2009, 01:00 AM Post #425
Wrestling Fan Posts: 93 Group: Die Hard Member #14,257 Joined: December 19, 2008	Delano has looked pretty impressive so far at the ROR! Team sections might be a little closer than most expect



BigPoppa11	Jan 3 2009, 02:16 AM Post #426
Fantastic Posts: 1,705 Group: Die Hard Member #4,855 Joined: February 3, 2006	sacromattackrom Jan 3 2009, 01:00 AM Delano has looked pretty impressive so far at the ROR! Team sections might be a little closer than most expect yeah if Scott West has 11 guys wrestle at Team Sections.



underrated	Jan 3 2009, 02:31 AM Post #427
Fantastic Posts: 1,402 Group: Die Hard Member #1,201 Joined: January 19, 2005	BigPoppa11 Jan 3 2009, 02:16 AM sacromattackrom Jan 3 2009, 01:00 AM Delano has looked pretty impressive so far at the ROR! Team sections might be a little closer than most expect yeah if Scott West has 11 guys wrestle at Team Sections. BigPoppa, I dont think they noticed that SW has 11 guys wrestling at ROR



crusader wrestling	Jan 3 2009, 09:26 AM Post #428
Fanatic Posts: 750 Group: Die Hard Member #8,788 Joined: June 13, 2007	underrated Jan 3 2009, 02:31 AM BigPoppa11 Jan 3 2009, 02:16 AM sacromattackrom Jan 3 2009, 01:00 AM Delano has looked pretty impressive so far at the ROR! Team sections might be a little closer than most expect yeah if Scott West has 11 guys wrestle at Team Sections. BigPoppa, I dont think they noticed that SW has 11 guys wrestling at ROR I did notice that SW was missing a few wrestlers. I think Del. is still up in some weights. Is SW still up also with a couple of guys? (Zilverberg/Seigel) I see Sowers is now ranked at 119#. This should make 119 indv. very interesting.



BigPoppa11	Jan 3 2009, 11:16 AM Post #429
Fantastic Posts: 1,705 Group: Die Hard Member #4,855 Joined: February 3, 2006	I dont know if any of them plan on going down. Its unfortunate that SW had only 11 guys wrestle. It kills a team when a #1 seed doesnt make weight. But this tournament doesnt mean anything. Individual and Duals are totally different.



crusader wrestling	Jan 3 2009, 05:29 PM Post #430
Fanatic Posts: 750 Group: Die Hard Member #8,788 Joined: June 13, 2007	BigPoppa11 Jan 3 2009, 11:16 AM I dont know if any of them plan on going down. Its unfortunate that SW had only 11 guys wrestle. It kills a team when a #1 seed doesnt make weight. But this tournament doesnt mean anything. Individual and Duals are totally different. When I watched the Hutch/SW dual, it looked like to me that Seigel could make 125, though I'm not sure about Zilverberg making 119. Nothing left in his legs, but has a thick upper body. I see kivel was down to 145, he looks like he could make 140 if he wanted to. I see Del. hwt. Nelson went 4-2. Was this his first matches of the year? SW/Del match ups Del. 103, 125, 135, 140, 160 SW 112, 119, 130, 145, 215 Hard to say about 152, 171, 285



BigPoppa11	Jan 3 2009, 05:52 PM Post #431
Fantastic Posts: 1,705 Group: Die Hard Member #4,855 Joined: February 3, 2006	crusader wrestling Jan 3 2009, 05:29 PM BigPoppa11 Jan 3 2009, 11:16 AM I dont know if any of them plan on going down.� Its unfortunate that SW had only 11 guys wrestle.� It kills a team when a #1 seed doesnt make weight.� But this tournament doesnt mean anything.� Individual and Duals are totally different. When I watched the Hutch/SW dual, it looked like to me that Seigel could make 125, though I'm not sure about Zilverberg making 119. Nothing left in his legs, but has a thick upper body. I see kivel was down to 145, he looks like he could make 140 if he wanted to. I see Del. hwt. Nelson went 4-2. Was this his first matches of the year? SW/Del match ups Del. 103, 125, 135, 140, 160 SW 112, 119, 130, 145, 215 Hard to say about 152, 171, 285 Are they even certified to go down that far. They may look like they can go down but thats because its all muscle.



truthhurts	Jan 3 2009, 06:33 PM Post #432
Super Fan Posts: 146 Group: Die Hard Member #10,150 Joined: January 14, 2008	Delano is looking good just like I thought they might. Dispite what BP thinks they wiil match up well against SW.. I don't know if they can put it all together an beat SW? It will be a must see event though!!!



BigPoppa11	Jan 3 2009, 09:04 PM Post #433
Fantastic Posts: 1,705 Group: Die Hard Member #4,855 Joined: February 3, 2006	truthhurts Jan 3 2009, 06:33 PM Delano is looking good just like I thought they might. Dispite what BP thinks they wiil match up well against SW.. I don't know if they can put it all together an beat SW? It will be a must see event though!!! oh trust me ive looked at the matchups...its gonna be a good dual meet.



Iowa guy	Jan 3 2009, 10:05 PM Post #434
Fanatic Posts: 714 Group: Die Hard Member #5,003 Joined: February 10, 2006	crusader wrestling Jan 3 2009, 09:26 AM I see Sowers is now ranked at 119#. This should make 119 indv. very interesting. Really? How?



fishy	Jan 4 2009, 07:29 AM Post #435
Wrestling Fan Posts: 71 Group: Die Hard Member #9,141 Joined: September 21, 2007	Iowa guy Jan 3 2009, 10:05 PM crusader wrestling Jan 3 2009, 09:26 AM I see Sowers is now ranked at 119#. This should make 119 indv. very interesting. Really? How? ummm, since Sowers is a good wrestler & would be one more very good wresttler at the Section Tournament, 119 should be interesting....Seriously, maybe there is something to all those old "Iowa jokes" my uncles always told me.



crusader wrestling	Jan 4 2009, 10:19 AM Post #436
Fanatic Posts: 750 Group: Die Hard Member #8,788 Joined: June 13, 2007	Iowa guy Jan 3 2009, 10:05 PM crusader wrestling Jan 3 2009, 09:26 AM I see Sowers is now ranked at 119#. This should make 119 indv. very interesting. Really? How? I just thought it was interesting because there has been a lot of talk about who is going to come out of 2AA @ 119, yet no one had even mentioned Sowers name as being a possible particiant @ 119. Dalton is a very good wrestler and he will be in the mix at 119 or 125. 119 (no particular order) Friederich Redding Sowers Zilverberg (or will he be at 125?) I see Sowers wrestled Zberg at the Rumble, won 1-0. Zberg may get a second chance to avenge his lost on the 9th. I see Sowers also wrestled Friederich at the STMA tournament, lost 9-4 and he might get a second chance to avenge his lost on the 30th. I see Delano wresltes NP on the 20th, so will we see a Redding/Sowers match up? I see NP has MLLC on the 8th, will we see a Redding/Freiderich match up? I see NP has SW on the 15th, possible Zberg/Redding match up? As you can see, 119 is looking very interesting.



Iowa guy	Jan 4 2009, 10:39 AM Post #437
Fanatic Posts: 714 Group: Die Hard Member #5,003 Joined: February 10, 2006	Thanks for the break down.



3/4 Neilson	Jan 5 2009, 03:52 PM Post #438
Fanatic Posts: 980 Group: Die Hard Member #6,483 Joined: November 6, 2006	bump



bobbobson76	Jan 7 2009, 07:51 AM Post #439
Newbie Posts: 1 Group: Member Member #14,260 Joined: December 19, 2008	crusader wrestling Jan 3 2009, 05:29 PM BigPoppa11 Jan 3 2009, 11:16 AM I dont know if any of them plan on going down.� Its unfortunate that SW had only 11 guys wrestle.� It kills a team when a #1 seed doesnt make weight.� But this tournament doesnt mean anything.� Individual and Duals are totally different. When I watched the Hutch/SW dual, it looked like to me that Seigel could make 125, though I'm not sure about Zilverberg making 119. Nothing left in his legs, but has a thick upper body. I see kivel was down to 145, he looks like he could make 140 if he wanted to. I see Del. hwt. Nelson went 4-2. Was this his first matches of the year? SW/Del match ups Del. 103, 125, 135, 140, 160 SW 112, 119, 130, 145, 215 Hard to say about 152, 171, 285 Just a correction Nelson Was 3-2 at the ROR but lost to two tough kids (Shaver from St cloud Apollo and Dehn from Owatanna) And yes that was his first action of the season



IMONTOPSTEP	Jan 9 2009, 09:58 AM Post #440
Fantastic Posts: 1,165 Group: Die Hard Member #1,101 Joined: January 17, 2005	The Great Gamma Dec 29 2008, 09:50 PM I don't see Delano in the hunt. I am impressed with New Prague. I would like to see Redding and Parriot wrestle a tough match though. Great Gamma - Is Nate Fredrich now qualify as a tough match for Redding? Redding beat him 3-1.



Wrestler0001	Jan 9 2009, 03:43 PM Post #441
Member Posts: 16 Group: Member Member #12,513 Joined: August 6, 2008	Will someone be at the Delano vs. Scott West match tonight? If so, could you keep us posted online



The Great Gamma	Jan 9 2009, 04:54 PM Post #442
Fanatic Posts: 914 Group: Die Hard Member #8,743 Joined: May 28, 2007	IMONTOPSTEP Jan 9 2009, 09:58 AM The Great Gamma Dec 29 2008, 09:50 PM I don't see Delano in the hunt. I am impressed with New Prague. I would like to see Redding and Parriot wrestle a tough match though. Great Gamma - Is Nate Fredrich now qualify as a tough match for Redding? Redding beat him 3-1. When did I say Friederich would not be a tough match? And to say it again, I am still impressed with New Prague. Looking forward to Sections.



IMONTOPSTEP	Jan 9 2009, 04:57 PM Post #443
Fantastic Posts: 1,165 Group: Die Hard Member #1,101 Joined: January 17, 2005	The Great Gamma Jan 9 2009, 04:54 PM IMONTOPSTEP Jan 9 2009, 09:58 AM The Great Gamma Dec 29 2008, 09:50 PM I don't see Delano in the hunt. I am impressed with New Prague. I would like to see Redding and Parriot wrestle a tough match though. Great Gamma - Is Nate Fredrich now qualify as a tough match for Redding? Redding beat him 3-1. When did I say Friederich would not be a tough match? And to say it again, I am still impressed with New Prague. Looking forward to Sections. I think you were referring more to Redding not wrestling tough matches, even though he had alread beat 3 ranked kids



Pippers	Jan 9 2009, 09:51 PM Post #444
Wrestling Fan Posts: 36 Group: Die Hard Member #13,980 Joined: December 3, 2008	:blink: imontopstep, you need to mature a tadbit methinks. Yes Redding won (ONCE) what makes you think he will continue to dominate Nate ?? Give them both credit for a very entertaining match (don't forget the NP coaches deserve a little credit too). Tooting your horn too much just may backfire on you, take it for what it was a good match that really doesn't mean anything in the long run other than letting two topnotch wrestlers wrestle one more time.



Jared	Jan 9 2009, 10:24 PM Post #445
Fantastic Posts: 1,639 Group: Fantastic Member #634 Joined: January 4, 2005	Pippers Jan 9 2009, 09:51 PM :blink: imontopstep, you need to mature a tadbit methinks. Yes Redding won (ONCE) what makes you think he will continue to dominate Nate ?? Give them both credit for a very entertaining match (don't forget the NP coaches deserve a little credit too). Tooting your horn too much just may backfire on you, take it for what it was a good match that really doesn't mean anything in the long run other than letting two topnotch wrestlers wrestle one more time. Geez..... how many screen names you got??



IMONTOPSTEP	Jan 10 2009, 06:47 PM Post #446
Fantastic Posts: 1,165 Group: Die Hard Member #1,101 Joined: January 17, 2005	Pippers Jan 9 2009, 09:51 PM :blink: imontopstep, you need to mature a tadbit methinks. Yes Redding won (ONCE) what makes you think he will continue to dominate Nate ?? Give them both credit for a very entertaining match (don't forget the NP coaches deserve a little credit too). Tooting your horn too much just may backfire on you, take it for what it was a good match that really doesn't mean anything in the long run other than letting two topnotch wrestlers wrestle one more time. Peter Peter Pipper Eater - you have to get a few more posts before you can rip into a veteran - NEWBIE !



TheKradleKing	Jan 10 2009, 06:58 PM Post #447
Wrestling Fan Posts: 47 Group: Die Hard Member #13,787 Joined: November 20, 2008	Pippers Jan 9 2009, 09:51 PM :blink: imontopstep, you need to mature a tadbit methinks. Yes Redding won (ONCE) what makes you think he will continue to dominate Nate ?? Give them both credit for a very entertaining match (don't forget the NP coaches deserve a little credit too). Tooting your horn too much just may backfire on you, take it for what it was a good match that really doesn't mean anything in the long run other than letting two topnotch wrestlers wrestle one more time. I dont think he ever mentioned saying redding will dominate anyone. redding beat nate and they will probably have a great rematch in sections. 2 "topnotch" wrestlers went up against each other .i dont think he was "tooting his horn" about anything.



chickenlittle	Jan 11 2009, 10:28 AM Post #448
Super Fan Posts: 363 Group: Die Hard Member #6,591 Joined: November 21, 2006	I think the re-match between Nate and Aaron is going to be another good match to watch. Nate probably had some nerves in that first match against him since he had the school record for wins on the line. But i think in a re-match it will be a totally different match and i can't really say who will end up winning



mnwrestler88	Jan 11 2009, 07:50 PM Post #449
Member Posts: 10 Group: Member Member #14,495 Joined: January 10, 2009	iowa guy is Aaran a tough enough match for Nate



Iowa guy	Jan 11 2009, 09:41 PM Post #450
Fanatic Posts: 714 Group: Die Hard Member #5,003 Joined: February 10, 2006	mnwrestler88 Jan 11 2009, 07:50 PM iowa guy is Aaran a tough enough match for Nate WOW, Let me think on that one. :blink: You are talking about "Aaron" Redding, right?



1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · High School · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
…
14
15
16
…
177