Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
- The Guillotine Forum
- →
- Talk Wrestling
- →
- High School
- →
- 2AA Team & Individuals
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
| Welcome to The Guillotine Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit. If you join our community, you'll be able to use many member-only features such as posting messages, customizing your profile, sending personal messages, voting in polls, and fewer ads. Email forum@theguillotine.com to find out how to get an account. If you're already a member please log in: |
| 2AA Team & Individuals; Top contenders | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jun 23 2008, 11:03 AM (737,823 Views) | |
| MinterMagic | Feb 20 2009, 10:51 AM Post #631 |
Super Fan
  ![]](http://z5.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)
|
Rutt was out last night as well...... |
 |
 
|
| chickenlittle | Feb 20 2009, 10:59 AM Post #632 |
|
Super Fan
|
Do we know why Rutt has been out?!?! |
|
|
|
| MinterMagic | Feb 20 2009, 11:03 AM Post #633 |
|
Super Fan
|
Just like every year, the post-season mystery ailments come to haunt some teams! Not sure as to why Rutt was out, but she was warming up with her team. |
|
|
|
| CC SportsGuy | Feb 20 2009, 11:43 AM Post #634 |
|
Super Fan
|
Add in Braunshausen and it's likely a 37-36 win for Waconia. And its Nostracommonus (if you're part of the Commonwealth). For Hutch to win Saturday, they'll need: Clobes maj over Seck Madson pin over Booth Ferrian dec over Drusch Hansen to get six at 130 Smith to major Brasket Madson maj/pin Manderscheid maj/pin Schlueter to win at 171 That would be somewhere between 34 and 38 points and Delano could get 36 with six pins, so Hutch would need either Rasmussen, Anderson or Settergren to stay off their backs. |
|
|
|
| IMONTOPSTEP | Feb 20 2009, 12:08 PM Post #635 |
|
Fantastic
|
Unlikely that Braunshausen would have pinned Dakota. I don't think he pinned the NP JV kid when they first wrestled - or struggled until 3rd period to do so if he did - unlikely he would have pinned Cole - he is just to strong. But since we are talking "if & but's" - Rutt would have pinned the 103 - so that would be another 1 point for NP. |
|
|
|
| LIVEWELL | Feb 20 2009, 12:24 PM Post #636 |
|
Super Fan
|
Forget the "if" and "when's" lets talk about the facts- where were Braunhausen and Rutt? If the dual was that tight the reason they missed the dual probably wasn't minor. |
|
|
|
| MinterMagic | Feb 20 2009, 12:36 PM Post #637 |
|
Super Fan
|
Making a statement like that, I have to ask you.....What makes you so sure Rutt would have pinned Steinbauer? Braunhausen did not "struggle" with the JV kid last time out, he was was dominating him by 13 pts in the second and then pinned him. After we beat you guys in Dassel, all that we heard was wait till we get our full line up back, it won't even be close.....I think I witnessed two teams last night that were pretty evenly matched....so give credit where credit is due! |
|
|
|
| Lock and Load | Feb 20 2009, 01:00 PM Post #638 |
|
Super Fan
|
So with all of this being said with Braunhausen and Rutt: and everyones predictions were to happen, the dual would have ended in a TIE. According to tie breakers, with all the new results factored in: We would go all the way down to Tie Breaker #6 total number of first points scored. Sounds like two pretty evenly matched teams to me. |
|
|
|
| Obsessed With Wrestling | Feb 20 2009, 01:10 PM Post #639 |
|
Fanatic
|
So now that that is solved, let's put our ideas together and figure out how NP can take out SW! Anyone? |
|
|
|
| MinterMagic | Feb 20 2009, 01:16 PM Post #640 |
|
Super Fan
|
I honestly don't see that happening, not that I wouldn't like to see it happen, but that maybe a tall order! |
|
|
|
| wrestling father 1 | Feb 20 2009, 01:32 PM Post #641 |
|
Fantastic
|
Well i hope he gets feeling better, I would like to see him fulfill his dreams, being its his last year. Good Luck to all the boy's in section 2AA. |
|
|
|
| crusader wrestling | Feb 20 2009, 01:32 PM Post #642 |
|
Fanatic
|
we did our part, as once again we wreslted SW last week with the flu bug going through our wrestling room. Maybe we passed one of our little friends along??? Same thing happened last year, but it did not work then, so probably won't this year either. |
|
|
|
| hometowner123 | Feb 20 2009, 01:37 PM Post #643 |
|
Super Fan
|
biological warfare in wrestling.... i love it |
|
|
|
| Obsessed With Wrestling | Feb 20 2009, 01:42 PM Post #644 |
|
Fanatic
|
It could happen!!! We could move the section semifinals to another school and say we sent an email, they just must not have gotten it!!! |
|
|
|
| crusader wrestling | Feb 20 2009, 01:54 PM Post #645 |
|
Fanatic
|
Cobes will get 6 Madson could pin Booth, but not Drusch Ferrian can get a dec over Drusch or Booth Hansen won't get six if its Sowers or Brasket Smith will not get a major if it is Brasket Madson can get maj/pin (if it's not Hessing) Manderscheid can get maj/pin (if it's not Bohler) Schlueter can win at 171 (if it's not Bohler) |
|
|
|
| IMONTOPSTEP | Feb 20 2009, 01:55 PM Post #646 |
|
Fantastic
|
It was a very evenly matched dual - I think credit needs to be given to both sides, I know there were some hard feelings in NP last year when Waconia chose NP as the 10th best team in section in the seedings meetings, when clearly they were not. I think NP had just a little extra something that they wanted to prove last night. For NP to step up and beat SW? I know that a lot of 2AA fans will be cheering for that. |
|
|
|
| Obsessed With Wrestling | Feb 20 2009, 02:08 PM Post #647 |
|
Fanatic
|
Ferrian pinned Drusch last time. I think Smith majored Brasket last time or it was 8-1, not sure. Madson did major Hessing Schlueter did beat Bohler Will be a fun dual again anyway. |
|
|
|
| MinterMagic | Feb 20 2009, 02:11 PM Post #648 |
|
Super Fan
|
Yeah I really bet all those kids said, lets prove a point for something that happened last year in the seeding meeting! Still upset for last year.....come on, isn't it time to get over it. If a coach needs to use that as motivation I feel sorry for him, I bet he used that same motivation technique when both these teams met earlier this year in Dassel (Looks like that motivation technique is 1 for 2). From what I hear, there isn't a whole lot of "you scratch my back and I will scratch yours" that goes on with all of the coaches in this section! |
|
|
|
| IMONTOPSTEP | Feb 20 2009, 02:46 PM Post #649 |
|
Fantastic
|
We don't have hard feelings for Waconia, we really have nothing to get over - we beleived we were a better team last year then the Waconia coaching staff thought we were - and we believed this year that we were a better team. We are just glad this year that when it counts - we had a chance to prove it. And we think next year we will be even better, we have a good group of kids, and even better kids waiting for their shot. Our coaching staff believes in our kids, our kids beleive in our coaches, and for Tikalsky having only his 2nd year as the new head coach - for us to get to the top 4 we think we are going in the right direction. We are hoping next year that Waconia can vote us as any seed they feel fits - are goal is the finals, whether starting from a pig-tail seed, or a #1 - and we will measure ourselves based on that goal. |
|
|
|
| MinterMagic | Feb 20 2009, 03:15 PM Post #650 |
|
Super Fan
|
You mentioned in your earlier post that there are some hard feelings......get to one side of the fence or the other! Things like this are why coaches vote against a particular team in a seeding meeting, you are doing NP no favors playing the revenge card.... The difference between these two teams is not that great, they could wrestle 10 times and be 5 and 5 against each other, they are just that evenly matched. We here in Waconia are realist and are proud of our team for what they have accomplished this year. You guys in NP keep that chip on your shoulder, because you obviousily need it for motivation, hopefully you can find something Scott West did to wrong you in the last decade and use that as motivation for your match up Saturday Night! |
|
|
|
| IMONTOPSTEP | Feb 20 2009, 03:42 PM Post #651 |
|
Fantastic
|
Mintermagic - Your frustration is shining through. If you read exactly - I said "were" some hard feelings. We have nothing against Waconia - and as far a revenge for motivation - a GOOD coach will use whatever it takes to motivate a team. Every wrestler is different and he uses many motivation styles. As far as revenge on Scott West - we will give it our all, if we come up short - we got next year - just like everyone else! And the "fence" you refer to - we just happened to land on the winning side this time - and you on the losing side. It may change next year - we will see. I think we should keep the "chip" on our shoulder though .... it worked against Waconia :) |
|
|
|
| UNDER THE RADAR | Feb 20 2009, 03:46 PM Post #652 |
|
Newbie
|
MinterMigic/IMONTOPSTEP Bring your singlets on Saturday night and put this thing to bed |
|
|
|
| IMONTOPSTEP | Feb 20 2009, 03:50 PM Post #653 |
|
Fantastic
|
You do not want to see me in a singlet! |
|
|
|
| ebacklund | Feb 20 2009, 03:57 PM Post #654 |
|
Member
|
Just a curious question as I have not really follows HS wrestling but, why all the hatred to SW? |
|
|
|
| MinterMagic | Feb 20 2009, 04:07 PM Post #655 |
|
Super Fan
|
I bet I could still squeeze into my old Chaska singlet.... she might be a bit tight, but then again compression fit gear is in! I might even throw on some of my old tights! IMONTOPSTEP.....not a bit of frustration here, I am a fan of wrestling....and GOOD coaches do need motivation techniques.....GREAT coaches gain the trust of their athletes and the athletes know what is expected of them! Good luck on Saturday! |
|
|
|
| CC SportsGuy | Feb 20 2009, 04:56 PM Post #656 |
|
Super Fan
|
Tyler Wendorff pinned Booth on the 30th, so I'm hoping little Madson can too. Sowers will be at 125, so Hansen won't wrestle him Smith beat Brasket 8-0 last time Madson majored Hessing last time Manderscheid will wrestle Tisch - that would be the toughest major - he only lost 8-6 to Poikonen Thursday Schlueter can beat Bohler again, who is clearly struggling as he lost to another solid wrestler Taylor Neaton Thursday I think it is going to be a really fun match to watch. Hutch will need things to fall into place like it did Jan. 30. |
|
|
|
| wrestling father 1 | Feb 20 2009, 05:39 PM Post #657 |
|
Fantastic
|
Now thats the only factual thing I read all day, LOL |
|
|
|
| holdyerbreathtillitsover | Feb 20 2009, 06:17 PM Post #658 |
|
Wrestling Fan
|
Looks like Scott West skated through their match with New Ulm Scott West 65, New Ulm 9 103 Luke Betchwars (SW) Dec. Ryan Hoffmann (NU) 8-6 112 Gave Fogarty (SW) Fall Cole Cihak (NU) :51 119 Lee Goldberg (SW) Fall Luke Derksen (NU) 5:57 125 Tyler Silverberry (SW) Fall Luke Schmit (NU) 4:41 130 Jake Siegle (SW) Won by Forfeit 135 Mark Dvorak (SW) Tech Fall Brandon Dietz (NU) 4:04 140 Paul Dvorak (SW) Dec. Sam Sletta (NU) 8-6 145 Alex Hentges (SW) Fall Eric Ellanson (NU) :40 152 Tyler Kivel (SW) Fall Jamie Gieseke (NU) 3:47 160 Nick Dvorak (SW) Won by Forfeit 171 Dillan Fogarty (SW) Fall Jordan Lilleodden (NU) 3:37 189 Mike Kroells (SW) Fall Adam Dauer (NU) 3:15 215 Pat Brinkman (NU) Fall Travis Hentges (SW) 1:35 285 Jacob Schmidt (NU) Dec. Bruce Koepp (SW) 1-0 |
|
|
|
| truthhurts | Feb 20 2009, 08:13 PM Post #659 |
|
Super Fan
|
I wonder why New Ulm and a few other teams fans aren't playing the if, and, or but game like some are today. Some teams fans need to Relax!!!! TRUTH is only Hutch or Delano stand a shot at beating the dreaded Scott West. Everyone else should just be glad they have no big injurys. Scott West is not really hated just really envied by most, only I hate them (just joking kinda). And everyone knows the 4 best teams are still in it. All the other teams would have had to have all the stars in line just right to get there. |
|
|
|
| sitandspin | Feb 20 2009, 09:44 PM Post #660 |
|
Fanatic
|
Damn Mike......I just threw up a little dinner thinking of you squeezin' into that singlets. It much be really stretchy fabric! :D |
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
|
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · High School · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
 12:38 AM Jul 13
|
|
|
|
|